Viktoria Hruncakova vs Harmony Tan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance in recent months reveals a slight edge for Tan, having won 40.98% of points on their second serve compared to Hruncakova's 40.81%. This metric is crucial as it often correlates with match prediction accuracy. Additionally, during return games, Tan has shown the ability to claim 48.54% of points from their opponent's second serves, whereas Hruncakova falls slightly behind at 47.49%. When focusing on first serve return statistics, Tan again leads with 28.37%, surpassing Hruncakova's 25.68%. These return stats can be pivotal indicators of which player might be favored in this head-to-head matchup.

Examining performance under pressure, Hruncakova demonstrates resilience by saving 53.52% of breakpoints, compared to Tan's 44.7%. These numbers are valuable for making informed in-game betting decisions. A broader performance overview from the past year shows that Tan has secured victory in 59.38% of their matches, whereas Hruncakova has achieved a 57.33% win rate. This provides a wider context for head-to-head predictions between these players.

Diving deeper into playing surfaces, Tan excels on grass with a career win rate of 68%, though shows weaker results on clay with a 51% win rate. Conversely, Hruncakova performs best on hard courts, boasting a 65% winning percentage, but has had challenges on grass with a win rate of 49%. These surface preferences can heavily influence match outcomes depending on the playing conditions.

In terms of playing level, Tan has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, winning 61.02% of such matches over the past year. Hruncakova, in similar events, has a slight edge with a 62.12% win rate. The relative event level of their matches should be considered when predicting match favorites. Furthermore, in encounters against higher-ranked opponents, Tan's opponents averaged a rank of 371.69 compared to Hruncakova's 376.09, providing insightful data regarding opponent difficulty.

In deciding sets over the last year, Tan has shown greater consistency by winning 65% of these critical situations, while Hruncakova's record stands at 52%. Such a statistic is vital for live predictions, especially if the upcoming match extends to a deciding set. In their attempt to capitalize on opportunities, Tan has converted 33.52% of breakpoints recently, whereas Hruncakova has been slightly more efficient with a 34.3% conversion rate. This offers a significant indicator for those engaged in live betting.

Considering these statistical comparisons and current forms, Tan seems to have a slight edge across various categories, particularly in pressure situations and return games. Based on the comprehensive analysis, Tan appears more likely to triumph in this encounter.